We’ve been a fan of the Richardson Magazine title for some time. It is a true provocative view of nudity in an arguably non-pornographic manner. A recent interview with Style.com shed more light on the man, the magazine, and the his take on the meaning of “asexuality.”

On the difference between a “sex” and “porno” magazines:  “Do you see Richardson as a porn magazine?No. We like to call it a sex magazine. We recontextualize sex; we’re analytical about it. Richardson isn’t about coming. Which is the point of porn.’ So what is the point?Stimulation. Not orgasm stimulation, but stimulating debate. It’s like an asexual sex magazine.’ “

What To Read Next