Comments on: Nike Air Max 90 Livestrong

By: eyesore

eyesore — Sun, 10 May 2009 17:13:24 +0000

they\’re OK nothing amazing

By: brian

brian — Sun, 10 May 2009 11:37:26 +0000

“these are ugly as sin compared to the silver snakeskin 20th anniversary editions”, “the materials look really cheap”

is this a joke? that snakeskin AM90 looks like it’s made of tin foil, and you’re talking shit about these? must be the ever-important 20th anniversary label that’s clouding your vision… these look damn good.

By: nba

nba — Sat, 09 May 2009 21:19:39 +0000

They look good, and Nike should bring some of its manufacturing to the us to help the economy, But the taxes are so high on manufacturing in the US so that probably wont ever happen. It\’s funny how any thing remotely environmentally unfriendly is a bad thing. What next a Tax on flushing the toilet. Who cares about all that though when Mental is charging 500 bucks for a pair of sneakers that cost 10.50$ to make . Forget it.

By: anon

anon — Sat, 09 May 2009 18:18:50 +0000

and even if it’s true that pollution is everywhere, you can’t disregard my original point. nike has got to be one of the biggest corporate polluters out there.

By: anon

anon — Sat, 09 May 2009 18:17:28 +0000

the materials look really cheap, colors are awful, and I\’m not going to cum everywhere because it\’s got a mesh toebox.

compare these to un-maizes or even maizes. this pair of shoes is ugly crap from the marketing department.

By: LeftyJeenyus

LeftyJeenyus — Sat, 09 May 2009 18:06:42 +0000

ugly as sin? you got drunk goggles on still this morning? Clean colorway, mesh toe, and good looking leather at the moment. Clean.
You do know pollution is everywhere, right?

By: anon

anon — Sat, 09 May 2009 17:37:31 +0000

lol.. aside from the fact that these are ugly as sin compared to the silver snakeskin 20th anniversary editions, I wonder how many people have gotten cancer as a result of Nike’s factory operations in China and subsequent pollution. probably a lot.