There are two kinds of musicians in the world: those who are reading to endure malnutrition in exchange for artistic credibility, and those who want to be filthy rich.

For the latter, the aim is always to penetrate the upper echelons of the charts, which, although no mean feat, isn’t really a fast-track route to pop stardom. For many, it ends up being a dispiriting anti-climax – a once-achieved high watermark, because many of them will never reach those same peaks again.

Remember the Baha Men? Whatever happened to those guys? Did they ever find out in the end who let the dogs out (who, who, who, who)? Who (who, who, who) knows.

And while I can’t tell you specifically what happened to them, because they’re so irrelevant that even Googling their fate isn’t worth the time or the finger power to do so, I can tell you what happened to them in the broadest of terms: they quickly fizzled out into irrelevance like a junkanoo supernova, never to grace the charts again.

The mean-hearted amongst you will probably dismiss this as a contemptible failure, but a huge proportion of chart-busting musicians will never repeat that feat, so the Baha Men aren’t unique in that regard.

Several years ago I came across an interesting statistic: nearly half of all musicians that created a chart hit in the half-century in between 1955 and 2005 never did so again – 47.5 percent, to be exact.

This Hollywood Walk of Shame includes the likes of Los Del Rio (Macarena), A-ha (Take On Me), Nena (99 Luftballoons), Chumbawumba (Tubthumping) and, more recently, Psy (Gangnam Style,) not to mention countless other has-beens.

This information comes courtesy of Storm Gloor, an assistant professor at the University of Colorado in Denver, who trawled through a full 50 years of the US Billboard Charts, punching numbers into a calculator to come up with this figure.

Your Highsnobiety privacy settings have blocked this YouTube video.

Of the 5745 artists who thought that they had realized a childhood dream by releasing a hit record, for 2732 of them, this would be nothing more than a false dawn.

Although tragic, this doesn’t necessarily mean that they would be denied a lifetime of fame. Take Vanilla Ice as an example: 1990’s “Ice Ice Baby” was his one and only hit, yet he has endured for nearly three decades as a regular pop cultural reference, the punchline of many jokes about shitty white boy rap, and he even appeared in season 23 of Dancing with the Stars. If you turn your nose up at this then I am really curious to hear what you have done with your life that’s so great.

So what is it about pop stardom that makes it so difficult to sustain? Actually, to call a one-hit wonder a “pop star” is highly denigrating to proper pop stars like David Bowie or Prince, who built long careers from consistently gauging the sonic desires of the masses. One-hit wonders are mere accidents.

Their place in musical history is cemented by the human desire for novelty. Because that is really all they are: a fleeting amusement that briefly entertained enough people to propel them into the charts. Fundamentally, one-hit wonders are the record industry’s version of a viral video.

Your Highsnobiety privacy settings have blocked this YouTube video.

This human thirst for novelty is a very real thing, hence why the one-hit wonder is such an enduring phenomenon (according to the aforementioned study, the percentage of one-hit wonders is pretty much the same every year.) Novelty is the lifeblood of the fashion industry, too: most people don’t buy new clothes simply because their old clothes are falling apart at the seams.

They do so because of trends and marketing or plain old boredom. Buying something new is a brief excitement in the same way that the Baha Men momentarily offered an unfamiliar sound to the musical mass market, but people quite clearly grew bored very quickly and decided that they weren’t worth listening to again. Tough luck, chaps.

But that’s not the only factor. Most people fail to comprehend how difficult the creative process can be. Execution is only part of the battle, and is in many ways actually easier than sourcing inspiration and forming it into viable ideas. I know plenty of great writers who work in advertising, because while they’re able to produce a fantastic article once in awhile, churning them out regularly is a far greater challenge.

This is a problem that plagues musicians, too. You’ve probably heard of the curse of the second album, which is when a band or musicians follows up a hit breakout LP with a terrible sophomore effort.

The Kaiser Chiefs are a prime example: Yours Truly, Angry Mob, their follow-up to the record that made them famous, Unemployment, saw a 55 percent decline in sales. Their third sold 75 percent less than their second. The fourth… who cares? Not enough to matter, that’s for sure.

Your Highsnobiety privacy settings have blocked this YouTube video.

A$AP Rocky’s first proper album, Long. Live. A$AP, which succeeded his break-out mixtape, Live. Love. A$AP was absolute rubbish in my esteemed opinion and you’ll struggle to find a critic who rates it higher than the aforementioned mixtape.

This is probably because he was too busy snorting things (I presume), engaging in orgies and revelling in all the excesses that his new-found fame allowed.

The same is true for pretty much every musician ever. Their eye isn’t on the ball. The hunger to succeed satiated by a brief taste of glory. You have your entire lifetime to created a debut, but the second is usually compromised by touring and record label pressure to strike while the hype is still warm, and that’s hardly conducive to inspiration.

Success isn’t simply a matter of talent either. Sometimes musicians are so in sync with the desires of the music-buying public at a particular moment in history that they create an era-defining work. NWA’s Straight Outta Compton is a prime example of this. But the zeitgeist moves on, shared tastes change, and an artist simply isn’t able to find that same synchronicity again – probably because it’s the sort of thing that only ever happens by chance, rather than any conscious calculation.

Linkin Park’s debut, Hybrid Theory, wasn’t a virtuosic piece of work. They were a faddish band that arrived at a time when the market demanded nu-metal. The critical and commercial disappointments that they produced afterwards are proof of that.

Your Highsnobiety privacy settings have blocked this YouTube video.

I would also argue that for some musicians, their talents and imagination are a finite resource. Mike Skinner, better known as The Streets, produced two cult albums: Original Pirate Material and A Grand Don’t Come For Free. The first earned him a five-album deal, but each release from number three onwards served only to cruelly illustrate the limits of his vision.

There was the odd good tune, but each of that final trio of releases felt increasingly strained and labored: forced by obligation to his record company rather than any sort of creative urge. As his finale approached, he openly admitted that he was quite done with The Streets, and his output since has been nothing like the music that made him famous (or even very good.)

Musical prowess is often viewed through a similar lens as sporting ability. Elite footballers don’t really lose their talent, they just lose power and speed that those talents depend on as they age. The physical body gives out, but the instinct remains largely intact. I don’t think that the same is true for musicians. Sure, the technical ability will always be there, or perhaps even increase with time, but chart success is overwhelmingly reserved for the young.

Look at the Red Hot Chilli Peppers as an example: their greatest successes came in earlier in their careers and critics widely agree that they have been in continuous decline since Californication. I challenge you to find me anyone who thinks that Metallica’s most recent albums can compare to their youthful creations.

Commercial success comprises so many components: marketing, sex appeal, stage presence, press savviness, but the most essential element is arguably being in tune with the mood of the masses – be that consciously or innately.

Young people shape the zeitgeist. They’re out in the field socializing. They know what’s cool and what gets pulses racing. With age we withdraw into ourselves, our social circle narrows and the vast majority of us will inevitably grow out of touch with fads and popular culture.

Sure, you can employ people to research and shape your image for you, helping you dodge your long-passed expiry date like Madonna does so pathetically, but the public can smell a fake. Musical peaks, like youth, often come only once.

If your hunger for good reading hasn't peaked yet, find out why this author is finally sick of Kanye West.

  • Lead imageMove it Like This Album Cover
We Recommend
  • Carne Bollente ss24
    One Kiss Is All It Takes for Carne Bollente
    • Style
  • new balanc 1906r polka dot
    These New Balance 1906Rs Hit the Spot
    • Sneakers
  • champion
    Champion And Deaf Musician Signkid Are Redefining The Way We Think About Music Accessibility
    • Street Style
    • sponsored
  • Product photos of UNDERCOVER & fragment design's FW23 Manuel Göttsching collab
    UNDERCOVER & fragment Made Luxury Merch for a Musician You've Never Heard of
    • Style
  • 5 gore tex alternatives help survive winter Hoka One One Rowing Blazers The North Face
    5 Water-Resistant GORE-TEX Alternatives to Help You Stay Dry This Winter
  • Image on Highsnobiety
What To Read Next
  • dries-van-noten
    You Can’t Just Read Our Dries Van Noten Cover Story, You Can Shop It Too
    • Style
  • dries-van-noten
    No, Dries Van Noten Isn’t Boring
  • andre-3000
    André 3000's Workwear Brand Has Been a Long Time Coming
    • Style
  • New Balance FuelCell Rebel v4.
    New Balance's Carbon-Less Shoe Is Still *Very* Super
    • Sneakers
  • Zendaya, Anya Taylor-Joy, Timothee Chalamet, Austin Butler on the Dune 2 red carpet
    Why the 'Dune 2' Red Carpet Outfits Feel so Vital
    • Style
  • Clarks Originals Walla Eden Lo.
    ​​Clarks Turned Its Wallabee Into a Very Nice Sneaker
    • Sneakers
*If you submitted your e-mail address and placed an order, we may use your e-mail address to inform you regularly about similar products without prior explicit consent. You can object to the use of your e-mail address for this purpose at any time without incurring any costs other than the transmission costs according to the basic tariffs. Each newsletter contains an unsubscribe link. Alternatively, you can object to receiving the newsletter at any time by sending an e-mail to info@highsnobiety.com

Web Accessibility Statement

Titel Media GmbH (Highsnobiety), is committed to facilitating and improving the accessibility and usability of its Website, www.highsnobiety.com. Titel Media GmbH strives to ensure that its Website services and content are accessible to persons with disabilities including users of screen reader technology. To accomplish this, Titel Media GmbH tests, remediates and maintains the Website in-line with the Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG), which also bring the Website into conformance with the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990.


Please be aware that our efforts to maintain accessibility and usability are ongoing. While we strive to make the Website as accessible as possible some issues can be encountered by different assistive technology as the range of assistive technology is wide and varied.

Contact Us

If, at any time, you have specific questions or concerns about the accessibility of any particular webpage on this Website, please contact us at accessibility@highsnobiety.com, +49 (0)30 235 908 500. If you do encounter an accessibility issue, please be sure to specify the web page and nature of the issue in your email and/or phone call, and we will make all reasonable efforts to make that page or the information contained therein accessible for you.