The battle against counterfeiting is an un-winnable war that’s further perpetuated by participating in it. Indeed, it is the fashion industry itself, with its manufacturing of desire and prestige, that creates a market for knock-offs. Until the very basis of the industry model changes, counterfeiting will endure.

This is a touchy subject within both the clothing business and the wider fashion community. The general consensus among brands and consumers alike is that counterfeiting is at best immoral and at worst downright evil. If you try to argue otherwise, like I did a couple of months ago, you risk being accused of being an “eighth grade Marxist” by a disgruntled commenter.

But just because the consensus leans towards condemnation, that doesn’t make it universal. When Highsnobiety went to check out OFF-WHITE’s new Hong Kong store, Virgil Abloh professed that “you can’t counterfeit something that’s not wanted, that’s the highest achievement that you can get: to make an idea and then someone want to make a copy of it.” I’ve already presented my own argument, and there’s actually substantial evidence that counterfeiting can actually be good for brands, some of which is outlined in The Knockoff Economy: How Imitation Sparks Innovation.

What legitimate manufacturers often refuse to acknowledge is that counterfeiting actually provides them with free advertising. The quality of snide goods has become so high that fakes are often indistinguishable from their legit counterparts. Sure, the right pair of hawkish eyes can inspect things like stitching to determine the legitimacy of a pair of sneakers, but if you spot someone on the street in some convincing knockoffs, your brain is going to respond to them in the same way that you would to real ones.

Essentially, this counts as free advertising. Not only that, but it’s free advertising via peer endorsement, which is far more effective than a piece of advertorial or a pop-up ad because it slips by our resistance to marketing. The desirability of a brand has little to do with its products, and more to do with the fact that other people want them.

While exclusivity is undeniably a major source of brand prestige, desirability is arguably more important. We’d all like to think that we’re terribly original, independently-minded tastemakers who are unswayed by peer pressure, but the fact is that we overwhelmingly pick things up by imitation.

This is why brands seed products out to influencers: because we crave the validation of other people. So when we spot someone wearing knockoffs on the street, that actually inflates the brand’s prestige because it signals to us that we’re not the only one lusting after a certain label or product, which makes it all the more appealing. There’s a tipping point, of course, but it's unclear where that is: after all, Louis Vuitton, Gucci and the like aren’t doing half bad, despite the abundance of cheap imitations out there.

Free advertising aside, knockoff goods can also serve as a gateway purchase. Renee Richardson Gosline, a researcher at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, conducted a two-and-a-half year long study that focused on 112 women who attended “purse parties” where they would buy counterfeit handbags. Gosline found that snides served as an introduction to branded goods which, rather than satiating their desire, actually caused it to grow. She explains this in greater detail in Forbes:

“Much to my surprise, and perhaps theirs, these consumers experienced increased attachment to the real brands. The fake products were a gateway. As my subjects’ knowledge of the luxury-handbag brands increased, they began to go into stores to check out the real thing–something they had never done prior... The fakes hadn’t turned potential Gucci customers away from the brand. The opposite was true. There were various reasons why. Women who’d bought bags at a purse party began to notice the inferior quality of the fakes–and envy the real thing.”

She also notes that “nearly half” of the women documented in the study would go on to fork out for a legit designer label purse.

The moral argument against counterfeiting lies in the assumption that knockoffs cannibalize a brand’s potential profits. That aforementioned commenter who accused me of being an adolescent commie summarized the reasoning behind intellectual property law fairly succinctly:

“Yeah [top brands] make a lot of money, because they make great products that people want. They then pay that money to their top of the line designers to come up with the next big ideas, to their shareholders that help the brand grow, all the way down to the people working in the factories. If everyone buys counterfeits then this process stops.”

Unfortunately for “Joe” and the 22 people who upvoted his comment, this is a simplistic reading of real-world economics.

For the “process” to “stop,” as he put it, a significant majority of a brand’s consumer base would have to cease buying legitimate goods for a sufficiently prolonged period of time to render a brand completely unprofitable. While this could happen in theory, the chances of it occurring in reality are slim to non-existent.

Think about it: how many people do you know that only buy knock offs? Not many, I would imagine. Fakes are primarily purchased by people who either can’t afford the real thing or don’t want it badly enough to pay the grossly inflated markups that come attached to designer labels. I might own a pair of snide Celine sunglasses but the rest of my wardrobe is legit. This can’t be counted as a loss for the brand because I would never consider paying for an original pair anyway.

The fact of the matter is that counterfeits exist in their own independent market, and it only partially overlaps with the legitimate economy. That’s not to say that counterfeits don’t infringe on a brand’s profits at all – of course they do – but it’s difficult to accurately determine how much damage is actually done because not every dollar spent on a knockoff is a dollar that was destined to be spent on the real thing. And when you take into account the free advertising and gateway effect enabled by snides, there’s a possibility that the black market actually boosts designer labels’ profit margins.

While this is difficult to prove, there should be little doubt that counterfeiting is a valid measure of success: if a brand is so appealing that it inspires copycats, then it must be doing remarkably well. Call me a contrarian, but if I were a brand I’d be far more concerned if no one was trying to counterfeit my wares because that would indicate that I have a desirability problem.

As Oscar Wilde so famously said, imitation really is the sincerest form of flattery.

For a deeper dive into counterfeiting in fashion, watch our documentary below.

  • Lead image:Aamachi Nwosu / Highsnobiety

What To Read Next

  • Image on Highsnobiety

    Rhuigi Villaseñor Gives Bally’s Curling Boots the Yeehaw Treatment

    Style
  • Image on Highsnobiety

    Marni FW23 Is Proof the Brand Is Flourishing

    Style
  • Image on Highsnobiety

    Tom Sachs' NikeCraft GPS Sneaker Returns in 2023

    Sneakers
  • Image on Highsnobiety

    Seth Rogen Comes Included in His $42/Night Airbnb Rental

    Culture
  • Image on Highsnobiety

    All Hail adidas' Latest Predator

    Sneakers
  • Image on Highsnobiety

    Revealed: Tiffany & Co.'s $400 Nike AF1

    Sneakers
*If you submitted your e-mail address and placed an order, we may use your e-mail address to inform you regularly about similar products without prior explicit consent. You can object to the use of your e-mail address for this purpose at any time without incurring any costs other than the transmission costs according to the basic tariffs. Each newsletter contains an unsubscribe link. Alternatively, you can object to receiving the newsletter at any time by sending an e-mail to info@highsnobiety.com

Web Accessibility Statement

Titelmedia (Highsnobiety), is committed to facilitating and improving the accessibility and usability of its Website, www.highsnobiety.com. Titelmedia strives to ensure that its Website services and content are accessible to persons with disabilities including users of screen reader technology. To accomplish this, Titelmedia has engaged UsableNet Inc, a leading web accessibility consultant to help test, remediate and maintain our Website in-line with the Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG), which also bring the Website into conformance with the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990.

Disclaimer

Please be aware that our efforts to maintain accessibility and usability are ongoing. While we strive to make the Website as accessible as possible some issues can be encountered by different assistive technology as the range of assistive technology is wide and varied.

Contact Us

If, at any time, you have specific questions or concerns about the accessibility of any particular webpage on this Website, please contact us at accessibility@highsnobiety.com, +49 (0)30 235 908 500. If you do encounter an accessibility issue, please be sure to specify the web page and nature of the issue in your email and/or phone call, and we will make all reasonable efforts to make that page or the information contained therein accessible for you.